Jurisprudential Disagreements and Descriptivism
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Descriptivism and the Philosophy of Mind∗
We distinguish between two versions of descriptivism. What we label “explanatory descriptivism” is a program for explaining how words get meaning and reference. Meaning descriptivism, on the other hand, is the view that many syntactically simple terms are synonymous with descriptions. It is a claim about what the meaning of such terms is, not about how the facts determine what the meaning is. E...
متن کاملAnalyzing Disagreements
We address the problem of distinguishing between two sources of disagreement in annotations: genuine subjectivity and slip of attention. The latter is especially likely when the classification task has a default class, as in tasks where annotators need to find instances of the phenomenon of interest, such as in a metaphor detection task discussed here. We apply and extend a data analysis techni...
متن کاملBelief Disagreements and Collateral Constraints
Belief disagreements have been suggested as a major contributing factor to the recent subprime mortgage crisis. This paper theoretically evaluates this hypothesis. I assume that optimists have limited wealth and take on leverage in order to take positions in line with their beliefs. To have a signi cant e¤ect on asset prices, they need to borrow from traders with pessimistic beliefs using loans...
متن کاملLegal Reasoning A Jurisprudential Model
In jurisprudence methodological shifts of practical significance have seldom or never happened overnight. The discussion concerning legal methods and legal reasoning has been a challenge primarily for legal philosophers and many legal movements basically mirror a theoretical development. Nor is it always an easy task to elucidate methodological aspects related to legal reasoning in works of jur...
متن کاملToulmin’s Jurisprudential Model, Inductive Probabilty, and Computation
1. The Toulmin Model and Assessing Connection Adequ acy Stephen Toulmin has established a connection between legal reasoning and a general theory of argument through his jurisprudential model of "the layout of arguments." In introducing this model in The Uses of Argument, he seeks to reject the Aristotelian (mathematical/geometrical/syllogistic) model of argument structure, which analyses argum...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Problema. Anuario de Filosofía y Teoría del Derecho
سال: 2014
ISSN: 2448-7937,2007-4387
DOI: 10.22201/iij.24487937e.2014.8.8171